comp.lang.cobol

Thread Index

Re: some help with COBDATA please...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: some help with COBDATA please...
- From: Vince Coen
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: Vince Coen
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: zCobol
- From: William M. Klein
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From:
zCobol
- From: Alistair
Re: Intelligence is in the controller
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: Duh_OZ
Intelligence is in the controller
- From: HeyBub
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From:
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From:
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: NEWS for Fujitsu COBOL users
- From: yyyc186
Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test - TRUNC(OPT)
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: On User Defined Functions and OO
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: tlmfru
Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: Jeff Campbell
On User Defined Functions and OO
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: btiffin
Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: OT: Seasons greetings to all in CLC.
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Seasons greetings to all in CLC.
- From: HeyBub
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: James J. Gavan
OT: Seasons greetings to all in CLC.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Wikipedia (was: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Wikipedia (was: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: btiffin
Wikipedia (was: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: btiffin
Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: btiffin
Can Open COBOL do this...?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From:
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From:
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Paul
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From:
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From:
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Richard Brady
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: William M. Klein
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: PR
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: PR
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: PR
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: Karl Kiesel
Final (I hope) Overlapping Artihmetic test
- From: William M. Klein
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: some help with COBDATA please...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: HeyBub
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: HeyBub
IBM system z and write protected code was Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: some help with COBDATA please...
- From: charles . goodman
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: PR
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: C and Low-level Storage
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: PR
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: PR
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: PR
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Mattias
some help with COBDATA please...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: HeyBub
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
OT: concrete and clay WAS: Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test
- From: Roger While
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: SkippyPB
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: Still one more Overlapping operands test
- From: Karl Kiesel
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: William M. Klein
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul H
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul H
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Still one more Overlapping operands test
- From: William M. Klein
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: William M. Klein
Re: C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: HeyBub
C and Low-level Storage (was: I need a new compiler...
- From: William M. Klein
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: tlmfru
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Alain Reymond
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Karl Kiesel
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Alain Reymond
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Paul
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Robert
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: btiffin
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: Paul
Re: Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: btiffin
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: Reagan and simplicity was Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Anoterh test request (overlapping oerands again)
- From: William M. Klein
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: tlmfru
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: Reagan and simplicity was Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: HeyBub
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: HeyBub
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: btiffin
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: SkippyPB
Re: OpenCOBOL 1.1 pre-release surpasses 9000 NIST standard tests
- From: btiffin
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: OpenCOBOL 1.1 pre-release surpasses 9000 NIST standard tests
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Active X problems was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: HeyBub
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Cobol Open Source
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: btiffin
OpenCOBOL 1.1 pre-release surpasses 9000 NIST standard tests
- From: btiffin
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: Cobol Open Source
- From: Richard
Re: Cobol Open Source
- From: Richard
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: Cobol Open Source
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Reagan and simplicity was Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: PR
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: PR
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Clark F Morris
Windows permissions was Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Howard Brazee
Cobol Open Source
- From: Alain Reymond
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From:
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul H
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Richard
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Richard
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Robert
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul H
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Alain Reymond
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul H
I need a new compiler...
- From: Paul H
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Richard
Re: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From:
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From:
Re: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Richard
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Richard
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From:
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Robert
"TRIM" in COBOL
- From: William M. Klein
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Robert
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: string to correct integer
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Richard
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: HeyBub
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Robert
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Richard
Re: Fujitsu and IBM mainframe compatibility (was: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: HeyBub
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Robert
Fujitsu and IBM mainframe compatibility (was: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: William M. Klein
Re: It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Functions as receiving items
- From: Pete Dashwood
Functions as receiving items
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: William M. Klein
It's COBOL, Jim, but not as we know it...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: William M. Klein
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Robert
Re: COBOL/CICS/DB2 - COBOL for MVS and compile option DYNAM - solution from 2006
- From: CG
Re: Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Recursion in Standard (was: string to correct integer
- From: William M. Klein
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Charles Hottel
Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: COBOL/CICS/DB2 - COBOL for MVS and compile option DYNAM - solution from 2006
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: [OT] Permissibility of Change? (Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?)
- From:
Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Darren Bane
Re: OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: [OT] Permissibility of Change? (Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Robert
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: string to correct integer
- From: William M. Klein
Re: string to correct integer
- From: William M. Klein
Re: COPY with replacing within copybook is it possible
- From: William M. Klein
Re: COBOL/CICS/DB2 - COBOL for MVS and compile option DYNAM - solution from 2006
- From: William M. Klein
[OT] Permissibility of Change? (Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?)
- From:
OT: OCaml and Haskell Programming Languages
- From: Charles Hottel
Re: string to correct integer
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Robert
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From:
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: tlmfru
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Richard
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Richard
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Robert
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: string to correct integer
- From: Karl Kiesel
Re: string to correct integer
- From:
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From:
string to correct integer
- From: mario
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: Robert
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From:
Re: FILE-AID (or similar) for Windows
- From: Vivian
Re: creating hash code of a txt file
- From: Vivian
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: HeyBub
Re: OT - Testing chevrons - no COBOL content
- From: HeyBub
Re: COBOL Programming competition
- From: HeyBub
Re: Cobol coders: Going, going, gone?
- From: