Re: Programming language survey
- From: Rene_Surop <infodynamics_ph@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:36:00 -0800 (PST)
At Pete's suggestion/request, and agreeing with his objective to 'let
them know...' I decided to try to vote. To do so, required 'joining'
and I allowed it to last only long enough to perform the intended task.
I didn't actually look to see who they are until after the vote was
cast. I saw nothing during the 'joining process' that demanded that I
adhere to their objectives. Once I did, that's when I concluded that I
would not fit in.
Aha, and let the Microsoft know the competition.... and that is just
the purpose of it. Another way of gathering info (stats). Survey works
both ways. It is a double edge sword at any rate.
Rene
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Programming language survey
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Programming language survey
- References:
- Programming language survey
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Programming language survey
- From: CG
- Re: Programming language survey
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Programming language survey
- From: CG
- Re: Programming language survey
- From: HeyBub
- Re: Programming language survey
- From: CG
- Programming language survey
- Prev by Date: Re: COBOL Program Editor
- Next by Date: Re: Fujitsu NetCobol 8.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Programming language survey
- Next by thread: Re: Programming language survey
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|