comp.lang.cobol

Thread Index

Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: tlmfru
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: riplin
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft & other myths
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: OT: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft & other myths
- From: SkippyPB
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Fred Mobach
OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Glenn
Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: Cobol Tools
- From: William M. Klein
OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Fred Mobach
OT: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft & other myths
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: HeyBub
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: HeyBub
Re: Cobol Tools
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: Cobol Tools
- From: SkippyPB
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: SkippyPB
Re: CICS Translator
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: CICS Translator
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From:
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: HeyBub
Re: Cobol Tools
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: HeyBub
Re: Cobol Tools
- From:
Re: Syntax Error
- From: HeyBub
Cobol Tools
- From: thelanis
Re: Syntax Error
- From: William M. Klein
Re: CICS Translator
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Runtime error
- From: Louis Krupp
Runtime error
- From: Anna
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Fred Mobach
Re: CICS Translator
- From: JC
Re: Syntax Error
- From: Pete Dashwood
Syntax Error
- From: Anna
Re: CICS Translator
- From: William M. Klein
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: HeyBub
Re: Runtime error
- From: HeyBub
Re: Runtime error
- From: tlmfru
Re: CICS Translator
- From: Michael Mattias
CICS Translator
- From: JC
Re: Runtime error
- From: Louis Krupp
Runtime error
- From: Anna
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: riplin
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: riplin
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: riplin
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Fred Mobach
COBOL - Vacantes Migracion y Conversion
- From: AgustinZabala
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: riplin
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: riplin
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: riplin
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: HeyBub
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From:
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: Paul H
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: riplin
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: Paul H
Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Rene_Surop
XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: Pete Dashwood
.XLS, not .CSV from NETX?
- From: Paul H
Re: as the case may be
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] "super" (was: as the case may be
- From:
Re: as the case may be
- From:
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: as the case may be
- From: tlmfru
[OT] "super" (was: as the case may be
- From: William M. Klein
Re: as the case may be
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: as the case may be
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: SkippyPB
Re: as the case may be
- From:
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: [OT] A Caution Regarding Nietzsche (was Re: Anyone using Vista?)
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Alain Reymond
Re: as the case may be
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] A Caution Regarding Nietzsche (was Re: Anyone using Vista?)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: as the case may be
- From: tlmfru
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: as the case may be
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Kerry Liles
[OT] A Caution Regarding Nietzsche (was Re: Anyone using Vista?)
- From:
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: Fred Mobach
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: as the case may be
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: as the case may be
- From: Doug Miller
Re: as the case may be
- From: Doug Miller
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: as the case may be
- From: Kerry Liles
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: HeyBub
Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note.
- From: HeyBub
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From:
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From:
Re: as the case may be
- From: tlmfru
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Michael Wojcik
ebooks for all purposes
- From: vajjahalamurthy
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From:
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: riplin
Re: as the case may be
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: riplin
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From:
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Kerry Liles
Re: as the case may be
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From:
Re: as the case may be
- From:
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note.
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: as the case may be
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From:
Re: as the case may be
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: SkippyPB
[URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008
- From: ammasakthisridhar
OpenCOBOL, Vala, GPS and limitless potential
- From: btiffin
Re: as the case may be
- From: Joel C Ewing
Re: status code 97
- From: Joel C Ewing
Re: as the case may be
- From: Robert Jones
Re: as the case may be
- From: Joel C Ewing
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Doug Miller
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: riplin
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note.
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note.
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: biblepolyglotte
The price of success... Firefox users take note.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Paul H
Re: Call a .BAT file? - Einstein extract
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: biblepolyglotte
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: biblepolyglotte
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: IT Training - was Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: status code 97
- From:
Re: status code 97
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Call a .BAT file? - Einstein extract
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: riplin
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Call a .BAT file? - Einstein extract
- From: tlmfru
IT Training - was Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: tlmfru
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Paul H
Re: status code 97
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: Anthony Aquino
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Paul H
Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Michael Mattias
Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions
- From: Anthony Aquino
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Fred Mobach
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Paul H
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From:
Re: status code 97
- From:
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Call a .BAT file?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Call a .BAT file?
- From: Paul H
Re: status code 97
- From: William M. Klein
Re: status code 97
- From:
Re: status code 97
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: status code 97
- From:
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From:
Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: status code 97
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: tlmfru
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: status code 97
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: scanning slides was Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
OT: scanning slides was Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From:
Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: status code 97
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values
- From:
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From:
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From:
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: tlmfru
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: HeyBub
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: riplin
OT: UAC affecting applications running on a USB key in Vista and beyond was Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Anyone using Vista?
- From: Michael Mattias
Anyone using Vista?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: Pete Dashwood
2nd byte (character) of File Status Values
- From: William M. Klein
Re: <NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: William M. Klein
Re: <NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status
- From: riplin
Re: Opening for DB2 DBA at MD
- From:
Opening for DB2 DBA at MD
- From: Cool Dude
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: riplin
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From:
Re: status code 97
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: <NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Howard Brazee
Warning! In-line PERFORM.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: status code 97
- From: William M. Klein
Re: status code 97
- From:
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From:
status code 97
- From: Frank Swarbrick
<NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status
- From: William M. Klein
Re: use of INVALID KEY clause
- From: HeyBub
Re: as the case may be
- From: HeyBub
as the case may be
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: use of INVALID KEY clause
- From: Robert Jones
Message Broker 6.1 on Z/OS consultant ...Need Asap
- From: Mike Proctor
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: riplin
Re: To Dashwood
- From:
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From:
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Waldek Hebisch
Re: To Dashwood
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From:
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From:
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From:
Re: To Dashwood
- From:
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: tlmfru
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Charles Hottel
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: riplin
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: To Dashwood
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Never seen before syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Never seen before syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: riplin
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: riplin
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: HeyBub
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: riplin
Re: Minor Correction
- From:
Re: Minor Correction
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From:
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: tlmfru
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From:
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: tlmfru
Minor Correction
- From: HeyBub
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: To Dashwood
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From:
Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From: Bill Gunshannon
[OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards)
- From:
Re: To Dashwood
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: COBOL program on punched cards
- From: Bill Gunshannon
Re: COBOL program on punched cards
- From: yong
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: COBOL program on punched cards
- From: Charles Richmond
COBOL program on punched cards
- From: mike
Re: use of INVALID KEY clause
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: To Dashwood
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: William M. Klein
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: David Essex
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Clark F Morris
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: HeyBub
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: use of INVALID KEY clause
- From: Rene_Surop
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: William M. Klein
Re: (OT) In search of a definition
- From: Albert Richheimer
Re: use of INVALID KEY clause
- From: HeyBub