comp.lang.cobol

• Date Index

---

• Cobol Tools, thelanis
  • Re: Cobol Tools,
  • Re: Cobol Tools, Michael Mattias
  • Re: Cobol Tools, SkippyPB
  • Re: Cobol Tools, Clark F Morris
  • Re: Cobol Tools, William M. Klein
• Syntax Error, Anna
  • Re: Syntax Error, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Syntax Error, William M. Klein
  • Re: Syntax Error, HeyBub
• CICS Translator, JC
  • Re: CICS Translator, Michael Mattias
  • Re: CICS Translator, William M. Klein
    • Re: CICS Translator, JC
      • Re: CICS Translator, William M. Klein
      • Re: CICS Translator, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: CICS Translator, Michael Wojcik
• Runtime error, Anna
  • Re: Runtime error, Louis Krupp
  • Re: Runtime error, tlmfru
  • Re: Runtime error, HeyBub
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Runtime error, Anna
    • Re: Runtime error, Louis Krupp
• COBOL - Vacantes Migracion y Conversion, AgustinZabala
• XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Rene_Surop
  • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, riplin
    • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, HeyBub
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Fred Mobach
    • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, riplin
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, riplin
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, riplin
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, riplin
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, riplin
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, HeyBub
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, HeyBub
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, SkippyPB
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, HeyBub
      • OT: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft & other myths, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft & other myths, SkippyPB
      • Re: OT: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft & other myths, Howard Brazee
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, HeyBub
      • OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, riplin
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: God is great... WAS: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Fred Mobach
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, HeyBub
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Michael Wojcik
      • OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Fred Mobach
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Glenn
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, tlmfru
      • Re: OT: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft,
      • Re: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Fred Mobach
      • Re: XP good until 2014 according to Microsoft, Howard Brazee
• .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, Paul H
  • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, Paul H
      • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, riplin
  • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, James J. Gavan
    • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, Paul H
      • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?,
      • Re: .XLS, not .CSV from NETX?, Bill Gunshannon
• ebooks for all purposes, vajjahalamurthy
• [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
  • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, SkippyPB
    • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Rene_Surop
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Rene_Surop
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Rene_Surop
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Rene_Surop
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, riplin
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, riplin
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Frederico Fonseca
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, James J. Gavan
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, William M. Klein
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Rene_Surop
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, SkippyPB
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Frederico Fonseca
  • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008,
    • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008,
      • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Kerry Liles
      • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008,
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008,
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Rene_Surop
      • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: [URGENT] DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008,
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Rene_Surop
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, ammasakthisridhar
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008,
      • Re: DATABASE CONNECTIVITY IN COBOL WITH VISUAL STUDIO 2008, Alain Reymond
• OpenCOBOL, Vala, GPS and limitless potential, btiffin
• The price of success... Firefox users take note., Pete Dashwood
  • Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note., Rene_Surop
  • Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note., Rene_Surop
  • Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note., Michael Wojcik
  • Re: The price of success... Firefox users take note., HeyBub
• Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, Anthony Aquino
  • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions,
    • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, Anthony Aquino
  • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, William M. Klein
  • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, HeyBub
    • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, Clark F Morris
      • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, Fred Mobach
      • Re: Cobol monograph hypothesis suggestions, Michael Wojcik
• Call a .BAT file?, Paul H
  • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Michael Mattias
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Michael Mattias
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Michael Mattias
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • IT Training - was Re: Call a .BAT file?, tlmfru
      • Re: IT Training - was Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file? - Einstein extract, tlmfru
      • Re: Call a .BAT file? - Einstein extract, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Call a .BAT file? - Einstein extract, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Michael Mattias
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, riplin
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Doug Miller
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Howard Brazee
    • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Paul H
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Paul H
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?,
      • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Paul H
  • Re: Call a .BAT file?, riplin
    • Re: Call a .BAT file?, Paul H
• Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Michael Mattias
    • OT: UAC affecting applications running on a USB key in Vista and beyond was Re: Anyone using Vista?, Clark F Morris
    • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • [OT] A Caution Regarding Nietzsche (was Re: Anyone using Vista?),
      • Re: [OT] A Caution Regarding Nietzsche (was Re: Anyone using Vista?), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] A Caution Regarding Nietzsche (was Re: Anyone using Vista?),
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Kerry Liles
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, SkippyPB
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, SkippyPB
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Fred Mobach
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, tlmfru
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?,
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
  • Re: Anyone using Vista?, SkippyPB
    • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Clark F Morris
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Clark F Morris
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Rene_Surop
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • OT: scanning slides was Re: Anyone using Vista?, Clark F Morris
      • Re: scanning slides was Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, SkippyPB
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, SkippyPB
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, SkippyPB
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, SkippyPB
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Michael Mattias
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, HeyBub
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, riplin
    • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Clark F Morris
    • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Anyone using Vista?, biblepolyglotte
    • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, biblepolyglotte
      • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
    • Re: Anyone using Vista?, Howard Brazee
  • Re: Anyone using Vista?, biblepolyglotte
• 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values, William M. Klein
  • Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values,
    • Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values, Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values, Howard Brazee
      • Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values, Clark F Morris
      • Re: 2nd byte (character) of File Status Values,
• Opening for DB2 DBA at MD, Cool Dude
  • Re: Opening for DB2 DBA at MD,
• Warning! In-line PERFORM., Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM., Michael Wojcik
    • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM., William M. Klein
    • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM., Michael Wojcik
  • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM., riplin
    • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.,
      • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Warning! In-line PERFORM.,
• status code 97, Frank Swarbrick
  • Re: status code 97,
  • Re: status code 97, William M. Klein
    • Re: status code 97, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: status code 97,
      • Re: status code 97, William M. Klein
      • Re: status code 97,
      • Re: status code 97, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: status code 97,
      • Re: status code 97, William M. Klein
      • Re: status code 97,
      • Re: status code 97, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: status code 97,
      • Re: status code 97, Joel C Ewing
      • Re: status code 97, Howard Brazee
  • Re: status code 97, Howard Brazee
• <NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status, William M. Klein
  • Re: <NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status, Howard Brazee
    • Re: <NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status, riplin
      • Re: <NOT> Invalid Key -"vs" Fie Status, Howard Brazee
• as the case may be, Frank Swarbrick
  • Re: as the case may be, HeyBub
  • Re: as the case may be, Joel C Ewing
    • Re: as the case may be, Robert Jones
      • Re: as the case may be, Joel C Ewing
      • Re: as the case may be,
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: as the case may be,
      • Re: as the case may be, tlmfru
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: as the case may be,
      • Re: as the case may be, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: as the case may be,
      • Re: as the case may be, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: as the case may be,
      • [OT] "super" (was: as the case may be, William M. Klein
      • Re: [OT] "super" (was: as the case may be,
      • Re: as the case may be, tlmfru
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: as the case may be, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: as the case may be, tlmfru
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: as the case may be, Howard Brazee
      • Re: as the case may be, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Mattias
      • Re: as the case may be, Doug Miller
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Mattias
      • Re: as the case may be, SkippyPB
      • Re: as the case may be, Doug Miller
      • Re: as the case may be, Kerry Liles
      • Re: as the case may be, Howard Brazee
      • Re: as the case may be, Michael Wojcik
• Message Broker 6.1 on Z/OS consultant ...Need Asap, Mike Proctor
• Never seen before syntax, William M. Klein
  • Re: Never seen before syntax, Pete Dashwood
• COBOL program on punched cards, mike
  • Re: COBOL program on punched cards, Charles Richmond
    • Re: COBOL program on punched cards, Bill Gunshannon
      • [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards),
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards),
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), tlmfru
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards),
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), tlmfru
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards),
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Charles Hottel
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), tlmfru
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards),
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), tlmfru
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards),
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards),
      • Re: [OT] Pack-Ratting (was Re: COBOL program on punched cards), Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBOL program on punched cards, yong
• Re: To Dashwood, Howard Brazee
  • Re: To Dashwood, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: To Dashwood, Howard Brazee
      • Minor Correction, HeyBub
      • Re: Minor Correction, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Minor Correction,
      • Re: To Dashwood, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: To Dashwood,
      • Re: To Dashwood, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: To Dashwood,
• Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Albert Richheimer
  • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, William M. Klein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Clark F Morris
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, William M. Klein
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, riplin
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Howard Brazee
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, riplin
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, riplin
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, riplin
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Howard Brazee
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition,
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Howard Brazee
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition,
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Howard Brazee
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition,
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Howard Brazee
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition,
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Howard Brazee
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Howard Brazee
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Michael Wojcik
    • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, riplin
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, HeyBub
    • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, Waldek Hebisch
  • Re: (OT) In search of a definition, David Essex
• Re: use of INVALID KEY clause, HeyBub
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: use of INVALID KEY clause, Rene_Surop
  • Re: use of INVALID KEY clause, Howard Brazee
  • Re: use of INVALID KEY clause, Robert Jones
    • Re: use of INVALID KEY clause, HeyBub

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Cobol  > comp.lang.cobol  > 2009-03