comp.lang.cobol

• Date Index

---

• You know what they say about statistics and statisticians, William M. Klein
  • Re: You know what they say about statistics and statisticians, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: You know what they say about statistics and statisticians, Doug Miller
      • Re: You know what they say about statistics and statisticians, Kerry Liles
• Re: DISPLAY Statement Throwing Trash No Matter What, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: DISPLAY Statement Throwing Trash No Matter What, William M. Klein
• COBDATA Tool source available at last, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBDATA Tool source available at last, Charles Hottel
    • Re: COBDATA Tool source available at last, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: COBDATA Tool source available at last, Charles Hottel
• IBM COurse - Quesiton on Java vs (and/or) .NET front-end, William M. Klein
• ocean technologies, vijay
  • Re: ocean technologies, Michael Mattias
• Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Clark F Morris
• Try sacrificing a chicken next time your code doesn't work..., Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Try sacrificing a chicken next time your code doesn't work..., tlmfru
    • Re: Try sacrificing a chicken next time your code doesn't work..., Rene_Surop
      • Re: Try sacrificing a chicken next time your code doesn't work..., Rene_Surop
• ECCO Women's Casual Pitch Premier Golf, Ardrey
• Delman Women's Vento Flat, Axson
• Zojirushi PAMTC14 Ultra Slim Air Purifier, Argyle
• Re: Wang COBOL alive and well as Wang VS makes a comeback, tjunker
  • Re: Wang COBOL alive and well as Wang VS makes a comeback,
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wang COBOL alive and well as Wang VS makes a comeback, tjunker
    • Re: Wang COBOL alive and well as Wang VS makes a comeback,
  • Re: Wang COBOL alive and well as Wang VS makes a comeback, tjunker
    • Re: Wang COBOL alive and well as Wang VS makes a comeback, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: Wang COBOL alive and well as Wang VS makes a comeback,
• COBOL - "BLOCK CONAINS" - IBM Marketting Request (more info), William M. Klein
• A simple program, tsalm
  • Re: A simple program, tsalm
    • Re: A simple program, tsalm
    • Re: A simple program, Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: A simple program, tsalm
  • Re: A simple program, Bill Gunshannon
  • Re: A simple program, Howard Brazee
    • Re: A simple program, tsalm
  • Re: A simple program,
    • Re: A simple program, tsalm
      • Re: A simple program, me
      • Re: A simple program, tsalm
      • Re: A simple program, me
      • Re: A simple program,
      • Re: A simple program, Michael Mattias
      • Re: A simple program,
• Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Frank Swarbrick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Frank Swarbrick
    • IBM - <un>Aaialble filet (was: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive Filestatus, William M. Klein
      • Re: IBM - <un>Aaialble filet (was: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive Filestatus, Michael Mattias
      • Re: IBM - <un>Aaialble filet (was: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive Filestatus, William M. Klein
      • Re: IBM - <un>Aaialble filet (was: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive Filestatus, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: IBM - <un>Aaialble filet (was: Succesful Status code (was:Request for testing of Reltive Filestatus, William M. Klein
      • Re: IBM - <un>Aaialble filet (was: Succesful Status code (was:Request for testing of Reltive Filestatus, William M. Klein
    • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Frank Swarbrick
    • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Pete Dashwood
      • Separation and tiered architecture WAS: Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Separation and tiered architecture WAS: Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Separation and tiered architecture WAS: Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status,
• Canon Powershot Sd 400, Algire
• SMS Sending in COBOL, Rene_Surop
  • Message not available
    • Re: SMS Sending in COBOL, Rene_Surop
      • Re: SMS Sending in COBOL, Michael Mattias
      • Re: SMS Sending in COBOL, Rene_Surop
      • Re: SMS Sending in COBOL, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: SMS Sending in COBOL, Rene_Surop
  • Re: SMS Sending in COBOL, Alain Reymond
    • Re: SMS Sending in COBOL, Rene_Surop
• Google Floating Logo Pen Set, faisal4jabbar
• Google Icon Vase Speaker - Black, faisal4jabbar
• Google Icon Vase Speaker - White, faisal4jabbar
• Google Mini - Next generation version, faisal4jabbar
• "Summer Of Love" Translucent Wide Body Pen Set, faisal4jabbar
• Jack In A Box Modem Cord, faisal4jabbar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Jack In A Box Modem Cord, faisal4jabbar
• Google Executive Combo Pen Set, faisal4jabbar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Google Executive Combo Pen Set, faisal4jabbar
• Hdtv Set Top Converter, Amel
• For your amusement, William M. Klein
  • Re: For your amusement, SkippyPB
    • Re: For your amusement, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: For your amusement, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: For your amusement,
    • Re: For your amusement, Michael Mattias
• Hdtv Signal, Amble
• Macbook Upgrade Core 2, Adi
• Acer Aspire 3680 Battery, Attard
• opencobol language reference, mlist
  • Message not available
    • Re: opencobol language reference, mlist
• BLOCK CONTAINS, Frank Swarbrick
  • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Charles Hottel
    • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Clark F Morris
      • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Charles Hottel
    • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Charles Hottel
      • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Clark F Morris
      • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, Frank Swarbrick
  • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, William M. Klein
    • Re: BLOCK CONTAINS, William M. Klein
• Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
  • Re: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
    • Re: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code - Relative File status when writing RRN=0, Arnold Trembley
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Clark F Morris
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status,
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status,
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status,
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status,
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Succesful Status code, Arnold Trembley
      • Re: Succesful Status code, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code, William M. Klein
      • Re: Succesful Status code, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Succesful Status code, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: Succesful Status code, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Succesful Status code, Clark F Morris
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Succesful Status code (was: Request for testing of Reltive File status, riplin
  • Re: Request for testing of Reltive File status, Jeff Campbell
• TRUNC(OPT) versus TRUNC(BIN), Clark F Morris
  • Re: TRUNC(OPT) versus TRUNC(BIN), William M. Klein
  • Re: TRUNC(OPT) versus TRUNC(BIN), Howard Brazee
    • Re: TRUNC(OPT) versus TRUNC(BIN), William M. Klein
• Re: TSO/E Exits, William M. Klein
• No wonder we can't get jobs..., Pete Dashwood
  • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Michael Wojcik
    • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs...,
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Howard Brazee
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs...,
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., SkippyPB
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., SkippyPB
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Howard Brazee
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Michael Wojcik
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Howard Brazee
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs...,
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs...,
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Michael Wojcik
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., SkippyPB
      • Re: No wonder we can't get jobs..., Howard Brazee
• funny calendar program?, David A Rasmussen
• Other "web places" (especially for IBM COBOL "lurkers"), William M. Klein
  • Re: Other "web places" (especially for IBM COBOL "lurkers"), Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Other "web places" (especially for IBM COBOL "lurkers"), Arnold Trembley
    • Re: Other "web places" (especially for IBM COBOL "lurkers"), SeaSideSam
      • Re: Other "web places" (especially for IBM COBOL "lurkers"), William M. Klein
      • Re: Other "web places" (especially for IBM COBOL "lurkers"), Arnold Trembley
• MF COBOL personal version, Paul H
  • Re: MF COBOL personal version, William M. Klein
    • Re: MF COBOL personal version, Vince Coen
      • Re: MF COBOL personal version, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: MF COBOL personal version, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: MF COBOL personal version, paoloricardo
      • Re: MF COBOL personal version, Paul H
      • Re: MF COBOL personal version, Michael Wojcik
  • Re: MF COBOL personal version, Agustin Zabala
• Re: COBOL - Vacantes Migracion y Conversion, bossandon . cyberia
  • Re: COBOL - Vacantes Migracion y Conversion, Agustin Zabala
  • Re: COBOL - Vacantes Migracion y Conversion, Agustin Zabala
• The COBOLATOR, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: The COBOLATOR, HeyBub
• History of programming, HeyBub
  • Re: History of programming, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: History of programming, HeyBub
      • Re: History of programming, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: History of programming, HeyBub
      • Re: History of programming, Kerry Liles
      • Re: History of programming, HeyBub
      • Re: History of programming, Clark F Morris
      • Re: History of programming, Kerry Liles
      • Re: History of programming, Pete Dashwood
• 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Mel_3
  • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?,
    • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Mel_3
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Mel_3
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Richard Brady
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?,
  • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, e p chandler
    • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Mel_3
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, e p chandler
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, paoloricardo
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, William M. Klein
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, Mel_3
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, e p chandler
      • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, riplin
  • Re: 1) Virtual to run DOS 6.2 ? 2) To run Micro Focus COBOL/2 Version 1.2.29 L2.2 revision 003 ?, HeyBub
• How can I define -.5 in COBOL, nishankjain . csc
  • Re: How can I define -.5 in COBOL, William M. Klein
  • Re: How can I define -.5 in COBOL, Doug Miller
  • Re: How can I define -.5 in COBOL,
  • Re: How can I define -.5 in COBOL, e p chandler
  • Re: How can I define -.5 in COBOL, Arnold Trembley
• Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), paoloricardo
  • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Rene_Surop
    • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), William M. Klein
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), riplin
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), William M. Klein
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-),
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Bill Gunshannon
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • [OT] Odd Personnel Policies (was Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-)),
      • Re: [OT] Odd Personnel Policies (was Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-)), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Message not available
      • COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), William M. Klein
      • Re: COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Clark F Morris
      • Re: COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Clark F Morris
      • Re: COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), SkippyPB
      • Re: COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), William M. Klein
      • Re: COBOL-only shops (was: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: COBOL-only shops, Michael Wojcik
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), William M. Klein
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), William M. Klein
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Arnold Trembley
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Arnold Trembley
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Michael Wojcik
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), HeyBub
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Michael Wojcik
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Howard Brazee
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Rene_Surop
      • Re: Coming soon: Turbo COBOL from Micro Focus :-), Pete Dashwood
• Re: Open-Cobol,
  • Re: Open-Cobol, Bill Gunshannon
    • Re: Open-Cobol,
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Open-Cobol, Michael Wojcik
    • OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, riplin
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, William M. Klein
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol,
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Michael Wojcik
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, SkippyPB
      • Re: OT: HTML mail WAS: Re: Open-Cobol, Michael Wojcik
  • Re: Open-Cobol, Vince Coen
    • Re: Open-Cobol, SkippyPB
• IBM Mainframe Calling Java from Cobol via JCL Batch STDOUT Issues, sjhesse
  • Re: IBM Mainframe Calling Java from Cobol via JCL Batch STDOUT Issues, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: IBM Mainframe Calling Java from Cobol via JCL Batch STDOUT Issues, sjhesse
      • Re: IBM Mainframe Calling Java from Cobol via JCL Batch STDOUT Issues, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: IBM Mainframe Calling Java from Cobol via JCL Batch STDOUT Issues, Sascha John Hesse
  • Re: IBM Mainframe Calling Java from Cobol via JCL Batch STDOUT Issues, William M. Klein
  • Re: IBM Mainframe Calling Java from Cobol via JCL Batch STDOUT Issues, William M. Klein
• Back to the Cyrillic problem, HeyBub
  • Re: Back to the Cyrillic problem, William M. Klein
    • Re: Back to the Cyrillic problem, Pete Dashwood
• Re: a clear conscience before God, Severi Lahti
• Named pipe with MF Cobol, Vaclav Snajdr
  • Re: Named pipe with MF Cobol, Michael Wojcik
  • Re: Named pipe with MF Cobol, Vaclav Snajdr
• Power Cobol, Jude
  • Re: Power Cobol, riplin
    • Re: Power Cobol, Jude
      • Re: Power Cobol, HeyBub
      • Re: Power Cobol, Michael Mattias
      • Re: Power Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Power Cobol, Jude
      • Re: Power Cobol, tleaders...gmail.com
      • Re: Power Cobol, Jude
  • Re: Power Cobol, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: Power Cobol, Michael Mattias
      • Re: Power Cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Power Cobol, Michael Mattias
• .CVS to .XLS, Paul H
  • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Paul H
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Frederico Fonseca
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Paul H
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Paul H
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, James J. Gavan
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Paul H
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: .CVS to .XLS, SkippyPB
    • Re: .CVS to .XLS, Paul H
      • Re: .CVS to .XLS, SkippyPB
• Acucobol printing with VISTA, Gio
  • Re: Acucobol printing with VISTA, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: Acucobol printing with VISTA, Gio
      • Re: Acucobol printing with VISTA, rtwolfe
  • Re: Acucobol printing with VISTA, Michael Wojcik
• COBDATA Tool and Web site, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, SeaSideSam
    • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, paoloricardo
    • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Kerry Liles
    • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Kerry Liles
    • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, SkippyPB
      • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Kerry Liles
      • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site,
      • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Kerry Liles
      • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Arnold Trembley
      • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, SkippyPB
      • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Kerry Liles
  • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Fred Mobach
    • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Rene_Surop
    • Re: COBDATA Tool and Web site, Pete Dashwood
• Re: fxd to html, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: fxd to html, Michael Mattias
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: fxd to html, Alain Reymond
• Questionnaire for academic research on the programming language COBOL, Anthony Aquino
  • Re: Questionnaire for academic research on the programming language COBOL, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Questionnaire for academic research on the programming language COBOL, Rene_Surop

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Cobol  > comp.lang.cobol  > 2009-05