graphical interface?

From: amlo <amlo2006nospam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:25:36 +0200

semi-serious analysis of cobol. because they do not like? because it lacks a graphical interface. would be enough to bring the screen section in graphical mode. maybe now with the visual cobol micofocus?
Or maybe not?
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: graphical interface?
  - From: Richard
- Re: graphical interface?
  - From: Alistair Maclean
- Re: graphical interface?
  - From:

Prev by Date: Re: Cretaceous COBOL, Jurassic Java, and now, Carboniferous C#...
Next by Date: Re: Cretaceous COBOL, Jurassic Java, and now, Carboniferous C#...
Previous by thread: Great Import Japanese Used Car from Japan
Next by thread: Re: graphical interface?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: graphical interface?
... COBOL does not lack a graphical interface any more than C++ does. ... 'helm view' with a perspective of the view ahead over the containers. ...
(comp.lang.cobol)
Re: graphical interface?
... amlo wrote: ... in graphical mode. ... maybe now with the visual cobol micofocus? ... COBOL does not lack a graphical interface any more than C++ does. ...
(comp.lang.cobol)