Re: Too many controls
From: Christakis John (you'll_just_send_spam_at_me.if.I.tell)
Date: 11/07/03
- Next message: Christakis John: "Re: Too many controls"
- Previous message: Christakis John: "Re: Packages"
- In reply to: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Too many controls"
- Next in thread: J French: "Re: Too many controls"
- Reply: J French: "Re: Too many controls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:04:57 +1000
You are right, I just finished typing something to this effect in another
post - something I had not thought of until now, even though I am already
using that functionality now. That is the nesting. The INI file is 1 level
deep max.
I think that storing everything in one place is the best way - it ensures
that nothing is missed when you are backing up. A sort of server-centric
approach. Now, all you need to do is ensure the reg is stored somewhere and
everything is safe. If you have to hunt down INI files scattered all over
the disk, you might miss one or two or more...
cj
> The contents of .ini files is not quite as flexible as the
> Registry. It's limited to string values (although I never use
> anything but string values in the Registry myself); worse, it
> doesn't offer nesting. So, to me, "scope" is the _advantage_
> of the Registry.
>
> Groetjes,
> Maarten Wiltink
>
>
- Next message: Christakis John: "Re: Too many controls"
- Previous message: Christakis John: "Re: Packages"
- In reply to: Maarten Wiltink: "Re: Too many controls"
- Next in thread: J French: "Re: Too many controls"
- Reply: J French: "Re: Too many controls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|