Re: BDE vs ADO
From: Toon Krijthe (remove.this.krijthe.and.this.too_at_xs4all.nl)
Date: 02/26/04
- Next message: Toon Krijthe: "Re: information"
- Previous message: Toon Krijthe: "Re: Conditionals in DFM's ?"
- In reply to: Christian Charest: "BDE vs ADO"
- Next in thread: Jeremy Collins: "Re: BDE vs ADO"
- Reply: Jeremy Collins: "Re: BDE vs ADO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:44:21 +0100
"Christian Charest" <ccharest@mtq.gouv.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:5ip%b.239$Xy3.859@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
> Hi i am working on a application that uses BDE connections and i want to
add
> ADO connections instead... i wanted to know your opignion on this change
and
> if it is a good idea ?? i also wanted to know if the code as to be
drasticly
> changed in order to go from BDE to ADO...
We just did that and it definitely simplifies life. These days you should
only use the
bde if you are using paradox or dbase tables.
ADO works very well with msAccess. Althoug we found some minor differences
in
behaviour after the port to ADO. Something with caching as i recal, so
please build
some good tests before the port so you can ensure the behaviour has not
changed.
Unfortunately I have no experience with stored procedures.
HTH
Toon Krijthe
- Next message: Toon Krijthe: "Re: information"
- Previous message: Toon Krijthe: "Re: Conditionals in DFM's ?"
- In reply to: Christian Charest: "BDE vs ADO"
- Next in thread: Jeremy Collins: "Re: BDE vs ADO"
- Reply: Jeremy Collins: "Re: BDE vs ADO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|