Re: Array comparison

From: Bruce Roberts (ber_at_bounceitattcanada.xnet)
Date: 10/07/04 

Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 14:15:31 -0400

"Maarten Wiltink" <maarten@kittensandcats.net> wrote in message
news:416558f5$0$21106$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...

> There is one interesting case that is unfortunately excluded by the
> named-types rule: one static and one dynamic array with index types,
> element types, length, and elements that all match. It would be neat
> to find those "equal".

I liked Rob Kennedy's suggestion that if its assignable then it should be
comparable. This would exclude dynamic vs static array comparisons and I
don't have a problem with that. Neat as it might be, I'm having trouble
coming up with cases where it would be useful.