Re: Which version for small .exes?

Ray wrote:
Which 32-bit version of Delphi produced the smallest executables using the VCL? I'm thinking about purchasing a copy of an older version of Delphi (perhaps 2.0 or 3.0) in order to develop the smallest Windows applications possible. I don't need any of the features in the newer versions of Delphi (i.e. 5, 6, 7, 2005, etc) anyway...

And does anyone know if Delphi 2.0 and/or Delphi 3.0 works well under Windows 2000 and XP?

Thanks 

Check KOL & MCK at http://bonanzas.rinet.ru/
.

Relevant Pages

  • C#: The concept of DataSet -Whose idea is it?
    ... Lately, I started writing some Windows applications, using C#, ... you would not have a problem writing Windows application in C#. ... Hey hey hey, I was going to dump Delphi for C# in the past, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • RE: Delphi Auditing
    ... Delphi is often used in a RAD environment; ... it's particularly good for creating windows applications quickly. ... Objects are passed by pointer - there is no passing by reference ...
    (SecProg)
  • Re: The trend is to move away from Delphi...
    ... Delphi is still the CLEAR number 1 choice for developing ... Windows applications ... to the fold. ... That is crucial IMO. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Delphi wish list
    ... happily run Delphi and other Windows applications on their Mac using ... Parallels or similar. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: to Delphi or not to Delphi?
    ... "Borland Delphi is only available for Windows and you can only develop Windows applications with it." ... there is Kylix, basically a Delphi edition for Linux, I would strongly advice against using it. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)