Re: Version after Version
- From: "ProfitMaxTrading.com" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:50:50 -0500
"Frank de Groot" <franciad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f1l7f.472$Ti5.15769@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Yes. AFAIK it's better because it has function inlining, something I
> managed to persuade Borland to implement (it took a year of incessant
> explaining on their server why it would be a good idea, now it's hailed as
> the "most important improvement" but they still banned my ass for
> diverting their time from their "real business", ALM & .net)
>> I ask because I might be able to acquire it on the cheap.
Way to go Frank.
>
>
> Delphi 2005 has "issues", though. Not the compiler, the IDE. It's slow as
> molasses (of course that's only my personal opinion and things might have
> improved). Many have said that Delphi 2005 is totally unusable (for them),
> but others said that after the third service pack and half a dozen
> unofficial patches, it's quite usable. I would try it first if I were you.
Unfortunately I won't really have a reference other than my VB6 IDE. It's
already on its way, so I'm now locked into learning it.
:-)
.
- References:
- Version after Version
- From: ProfitMaxTrading.com
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: ProfitMaxTrading.com
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Version after Version
- Prev by Date: Re: Version after Version
- Next by Date: Re: Version after Version
- Previous by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Next by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|