Re: Version after Version
- From: erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx (J French)
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:31:23 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:28:55 +0200, "Frank de Groot"
<franciad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"J French" <erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>
>
>> While the move from 16 to 32 bit was of major significance, the
>> emergence of 64 bit processors strikes me as something of a yawn.
>
>Not if you need speed.
>When written to take advantage of the 64-bit wide data path, applications
>can become twice as fast.
I fail to follow why that should be the case
- It will increase speed when copying largish chunks of memory
- but will have zilch efect on copying say a 4 byte pointer
It is possible that copying 4 bytes will be slower
>> With the exception of one guy here, I've never run into a system that
>> really needs so much memory
>All servers "need" it, nowadays.
Such machines would probably be better off with banks of memory
>> To my knowledge Delphi has had the WideString for quite some time, not
>> that one uses it much.
>Everyone that takes the Asian market seriously, needs full-fledged Unicode
>capability of the VCL, not just WideString.
I suppose so, but I have such a strong dislike of Unicode ...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Maarten Wiltink
- Re: Version after Version
- References:
- Version after Version
- From: ProfitMaxTrading.com
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: J French
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Version after Version
- Prev by Date: When to create TCustomControl's child controls?
- Next by Date: Re: Version after Version
- Previous by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Next by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|