Re: Version after Version
- From: "Maarten Wiltink" <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:37:41 +0200
"J French" <erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:435f6ba6.187240378@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:42:40 +0200, "Maarten Wiltink"
> <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So what exactly is your beef with Unicode?
>
> Pretty much the same as with MBCS
>
> I detest things that frig with my data
Unicode is just a (really long) character set. It gets ugly when
you try to compress the characters. There's a simple solution: don't.
It's perfectly workable to have two-byte characters. Both in the
range of characters you can use and the memory it takes up.
Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Version after Version
- From: J French
- Re: Version after Version
- References:
- Version after Version
- From: ProfitMaxTrading.com
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: J French
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: J French
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Maarten Wiltink
- Re: Version after Version
- From: J French
- Version after Version
- Prev by Date: Re: Version after Version
- Next by Date: Re: Version after Version
- Previous by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Next by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|