Re: Version after Version
- From: "Frank de Groot" <franciad@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:53:52 +0200
"Bruce Roberts" <dontsendtober@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rXR7f.6988
> cpu. I don't think one can assume that a 64-bit cpu is going to load
> 64-bits in a single cycle, even if we are talking about L1 cache.
It does.
> In theory 64-bit should generally be faster, but lots of software
> revisions are likely required to see this in practice. A program that uses
> 32-bit integers, for example, may well end up paying a penalty for
> half-word increments and arithmetic. Given that the bulk of modern
> software mostly does string manipulation of one form or another, (last
> stat I recall puts it at roughly 60% of all business processing), its
> likely that the move to 64-bit on the desktop will bring measurable, but
> marginal, improvements.
Perhaps /your/ desktop is doing "business processing", but last time I
looked, the big money was in home users, especially _games_.
We're talking billions of USD here. Almost everything home users pay money
for, benefits by 64-bit rewrites.
Encryption/decryption, games, encoding/decoding (playing movies full-screen
whilst doing some photo-batch processing), audio stuff, video editng,
picture manipulations It is all much snappier with 64 bits, and the near
future will be dual-core 64 bits, so you better not only learn how to
program efficiently for 64-bits, but to do it multi-threadedly as well, or
be a dinosaur.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Syd Tripper
- Re: Version after Version
- References:
- Version after Version
- From: ProfitMaxTrading.com
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: J French
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Marc Rohloff
- Re: Version after Version
- From: ProfitMaxTrading.com
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Bruce Roberts
- Version after Version
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: how do i code this (active form control)?
- Next by Date: Re: Version after Version
- Previous by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Next by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|