Re: Version after Version
- From: "Maarten Wiltink" <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:43:05 +0200
"Frank de Groot" <franciad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Rht8f.490$Ti5.16479@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]
> Simple example: You can do two 32-bit additions in parallel, when doing
> them side-by side in a 64-bit register.
I tend to do my operations one method call at a time, not MxN bits at a
time.
Wider data paths can be very beneficial in, say, database servers. But
applications programmers aren't going to notice much.
Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- References:
- Version after Version
- From: ProfitMaxTrading.com
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: J French
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Marc Rohloff
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Marc Rohloff
- Re: Version after Version
- From: Frank de Groot
- Version after Version
- Prev by Date: Re: Searching in byte buffer
- Next by Date: Re: Version after Version
- Previous by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Next by thread: Re: Version after Version
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|