Re: Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- From: "Maarten Wiltink" <maarten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:14:51 +0200
"Nigel Baker" <baker_n@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9q7dvm7q0l39$.1if11h07hnmzz.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<his life history, just about>
And good reading it was, too.
[GFA Basic] did something I have not seen since; it would 'fold' a
procedure down to a single line, very handy for quickly navigating
around a large project.
Many recent IDEs do that. I think Visual Studio introduced it into the
mass's consciousness, then everybody else followed - without saying
VS was actually the first ever or even in the current wave. Plus, it's
not really a sufficient reason to switch to it. VS is not nicer than
Delphi.
Pascal actually has something like it in another way - the interface
section. Since D5 or so, you can even switch between the interface and
implementation sections with Ctrl-Shift-Up/Down. This neatly does almost
the same thing.
[...]
You count starting with 1 dammit, not 0 !!!
You can't. How would you count 'no cigars'? The first number is zero.
If you see an index as 'the number of items to skip', the first index
is zero, too.
Groetjes,
Maarten Wiltink
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- From: Nigel Baker
- Re: Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- References:
- Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- From: Nigel Baker
- Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- Prev by Date: Re: Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- Next by Date: Re: Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- Previous by thread: Re: Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- Next by thread: Re: Scope of Procedures Follow-up
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|