alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi

• Thread Index

---

• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Chris.Cheney
• Re: who is able to develop N-level application of delphi
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: who is able to develop N-level application of delphi
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: who is able to develop N-level application of delphi
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: who is able to develop N-level application of delphi
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: who is able to develop N-level application of delphi
  • From: Jamie
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Jamie
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Heinrich Wolf
• Re: Print pagenumber on Quickreport
  • From: kennedyri
• Print pagenumber on Quickreport
  • From: Michaël
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Troll
• Re: elementary question about Quickreport
  • From: Troll
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: surena
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Cafetorium
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Jamie
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Chris.Cheney
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Chris.Cheney
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Chris.Cheney
• Re: number beginning with zerro
  • From: Heinrich Wolf
• number beginning with zerro
  • From: surena
• Re: elementary question about Quickreport
  • From: surena
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Feature Request: control-alt-space should show completely function prototype to see return types as well.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Problem with IDesigner
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: elementary question about Quickreport
  • From: Troll
• Error accessing the OLE registry message in Vista
  • From: Jaap
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Cafetorium
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Cafetorium
• elementary question about Quickreport
  • From: surena
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Need a jump opcode generator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Feature Request: Additional Copy n Paste Method: Alt + Insert, Alt + Z, X, C, V etc.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Feature Request: control-alt-space should show completely function prototype to see return types as well.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Feature Request: control-alt-space should show completely function prototype to see return types as well.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Feature Request: control-alt-space should show completely function prototype to see return types as well.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: can not change height
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Updating from Delphi 5
  • From: Bob Richardson
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Jamie
• Updating from Delphi 5
  • From: Christakis John
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Jamie
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Chris.Cheney
• network paradox table
  • From: Brian
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Cafetorium
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Cafetorium
• Re: TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Chris.Cheney
• TXMLDocument and TTreeView
  • From: Cafetorium
• Well, Visual Studio has it, Free Pascal not really.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Civilization 3 Conquest Winsock 2 Interception Idea. (OS:Win64)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Delphi has fallen behind in 64 bit area BIG TIME.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Simple free database
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: can not change height
  • From: Jamie
• can not change height
  • From: surena
• Simple free database
  • From: battles
• HAY DudFuck Sighing, still missing the point ?
  • From: hutch--
• Re: HAY DudFuck, why do you have to keep answering your own posts ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• HAY DudFuck, why do you have to keep answering your own posts ?
  • From: hutch--
• HAY FudFuck Skying, you still have not got it yet.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: HAY CrudFuck Crying, you are still spamming other groups.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• HAY CrudFuck Crying, you are still spamming other groups.
  • From: hutch--
• Physics proves that the sky is green
  • From: Troll
• Re: HAY DryFuck Dying, stop spamming other groups with you shit.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY FloodFuck Frying, you have not connected it yet.
  • From: Troll
• Re: HAY DryFuck Dying, stop spamming other groups with you shit.
  • From: Troll
• HAY FloodFuck Frying, you have not connected it yet.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Another NOTE for DudFuck.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Another NOTE for DudFuck.
  • From: hutch--
• HAY DudFuck Drying, still have not connected about your spam yet ?
  • From: hutch--
• Re: borlandC++Builder5
  • From: philippe.doulet
• Re: CreateProcess and CloseHandle
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Re: HAY FlyFuck Crying, hasn't it connected yet ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• HAY FlyFuck Crying, hasn't it connected yet ?
  • From: hutch--
• Re: HAY DryFuck Dying, stop spamming other groups with you shit.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• HAY DryFuck Dying, stop spamming other groups with you shit.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: HAY FlyFuck Crying, Uve dunnit again.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• HAY FlyFuck Crying, Uve dunnit again.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: More information about how parameter are passed, and which registers are save to use in help please.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• More information about how parameter are passed, and which registers are save to use in help please.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Feature Request: Add language basics to Delphi 2007 Help <- make one location for information.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE/Editor Bug: After viewing the CPU window and terminating the application, the editor maximizes and falls of the right side of the screen.
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• Help with TreeView
  • From: maiskander
• Delphi 2007 IDE/Editor Bug: After viewing the CPU window and terminating the application, the editor maximizes and falls of the right side of the screen.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: borlandC++Builder5
  • From: Jamie
• borlandC++Builder5
  • From: philippe.doulet
• Re: Debugging tool: Branches taken/not taken.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Debugging tool: Branches taken/not taken.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Problem with IDesigner
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Re: it's possible make plug-in module
  • From: Jamie
• Re: it's possible make plug-in module
  • From: scriptors
• Re: Checking Packages
  • From: Christakis John
• Re: Debugging tool: Branches taken/not taken.
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• Re: Problem with IDesigner
  • From: Jamie
• Re: it's possible make plug-in module
  • From: Jamie
• Debugging tool: Branches taken/not taken.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Problem with IDesigner
  • From: rosoft
• Re: printing a form
  • From: Code4Sale.com
• it's possible make plug-in module
  • From: scriptors
• Re: Checking Packages
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Checking Packages
  • From: Christakis John
• Re: printing a form
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• DirectSound
  • From: Fonon
• printing a form
  • From: surena
• Re: Fund for skysuck: please donate so he'll get a better life... ehm.. *a* life
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Fund for skysuck: please donate so he'll get a better life... ehm.. *a* life
  • From: spam2you
• Re: Fund for skysuck: please donate so he'll get a better life... ehm.. *a* life
  • From: spam2you
• Fund for skysuck: please donate so he'll get a better life... ehm.. *a* life
  • From: spam2you
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Heinrich Wolf
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• OT: STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: MikeB
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: YGTBK
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: iikushan
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: static dll linking
  • From: Jarek Stok?osa
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Jarek Stok?osa
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: iikushan
• Re: Case Statement Error
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Case Statement Error
  • From: iikushan
• HAY DumbFuck Dying, you have not connected the idea yet.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: MikeB
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: spam2you
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• Re: Delphi 2007: Negative Int64 + Positive Uint64 = INTEGER OVERFLOW ?!?!?! (-9223372036854775808 + 18446744073709551615 should be: 9223372036854775807)
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Delphi 2007: Negative Int64 + Positive Uint64 = INTEGER OVERFLOW ?!?!?! (-9223372036854775808 + 18446744073709551615 should be: 9223372036854775807)
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Too much overhead for record/overloaded operators.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007: Negative Int64 + Positive Uint64 = INTEGER OVERFLOW ?!?!?! (-9223372036854775808 + 18446744073709551615 should be: 9223372036854775807)
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Delphi 2007: Negative Int64 + Positive Uint64 = INTEGER OVERFLOW ?!?!?! (-9223372036854775808 + 18446744073709551615 should be: 9223372036854775807)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• HAY DryFuck, STOP spamming other groups with Delphi crap.
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Skybuck's Negation Methods (version 0.04, final).
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: static dll linking
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: static dll linking
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Skybuck's Negation Methods (version 0.04, final).
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: static dll linking
  • From: kennedyri
• Re: Skybuck's Negation Methods (version 0.04, final).
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Skybuck's Negation Methods (version 0.04, final).
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• static dll linking
  • From: amarok
• Re: Delphi 2007: Negative Int64 + Positive Uint64 = INTEGER OVERFLOW ?!?!?! (-9223372036854775808 + 18446744073709551615 should be: 9223372036854775807)
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• TQuery question
  • From: fu
• Re: Delphi 2007 help: List of compiler directives missing.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Delphi 2007 help: List of compiler directives missing.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: HAHA Jim The Troll WAS WRONG: BTS can't be inlined ! At least not in Delphi 2007.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: HAHA Jim The Troll WAS WRONG: BTS can't be inlined ! At least not in Delphi 2007.
  • From: Marcel Overweel
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Loading Image from TMemoryStream if don't know Image type
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Test xor effect on booleans in if statement :)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Delphi 2007 reacts to thumb buttons kinda annoying.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: How to implement two's complement on a two's complement cpu ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Borland uninstal?
  • From: Hyper
• Loading Image from TMemoryStream if don't know Image type
  • From: eric . zoons
• Re: form' font
  • From: alanglloyd@xxxxxxx
• Re: form' font
  • From: surena
• Re: form' font
  • From: alanglloyd@xxxxxxx
• form' font
  • From: surena
• form' font
  • From: surena
• Re: Skybuck's arbitrary bucket sort algorithm. Order(N^2)
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Skybuck's arbitrary bucket sort algorithm. Order(N^2)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Skybuck's arbitrary bucket sort algorithm. Order(N^2)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Possibly new sort method/idea: Skybuck's two third ping pong sort algorithm :) Order(N^2), steps approximation: (N^2) div 2
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Possibly new sort method/idea: Skybuck's two third ping pong sort algorithm :) Order(N^2), steps approximation: (N^2) div 2
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Once again: 64 bit version of random needed. (Probably 128 bit needed)
  • From: Fucktard Crying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Suppress raising an exception
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Once again: 64 bit version of random needed. (Probably 128 bit needed)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Streaming audio
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Once again: 64 bit version of random needed. (Probably 128 bit needed)
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Inline function must not have ASM BLOCK ?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Inline function must not have ASM BLOCK ?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Streaming audio
  • From: G Baars
• Re: Inline function must not have ASM BLOCK ?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Inline function must not have ASM BLOCK ?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Inline function must not have ASM BLOCK ?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Delphi 2007: Still not possible: for vIndex := -9223372036854775808 downto -1 do
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: sheep
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Pop Quiz: Raising an exception inside a function in relation to the return values.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Pop Quiz: Raising an exception inside a function in relation to the return values.
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Re: Pop Quiz: Raising an exception inside a function in relation to the return values.
  • From: Rob Kennedy
• Re: Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Pop Quiz: Raising an exception inside a function in relation to the return values.
  • From: Stefan Meisner
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Pop Quiz: Raising an exception inside a function in relation to the return values.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Pop Quiz: Raising an exception inside a function in relation to the return values.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Delphi 2007 Smallint Implicit Operator BUG !?!?!? Integer Implicit Operator gets called instead ?!?!?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Implicit vs Explicit typecast/conversion operator ?
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Pop Quiz: Raising an exception inside a function in relation to the return values.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Implicit vs Explicit typecast/conversion operator ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: sheep
• Re: Disabling Debugger Exception Notification for a few lines ?
  • From: kennedyri
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: StringGrid Row Colour
  • From: Brian
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: StringGrid Row Colour
  • From: alanglloyd@xxxxxxx
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• StringGrid Row Colour
  • From: Brian
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Shift Left and Shift Right operator overloading problem ? (win32)
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Shift Left and Shift Right operator overloading problem ? (win32)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: sheep
• Disabling Debugger Exception Notification for a few lines ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• Re: Shift Left and Shift Right operator overloading problem ? (win32)
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Interesting bug: A := -A; // When A is -2147483648 it remains -2147483648
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Borland infiltrated by saboteur.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 could be usefull after all for my purposes ;)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Shift Left and Shift Right operator overloading problem ? (win32)
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• <> Bit index operator.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Operator overloading in Delphi 2007 for Win32 Totally useless for my purposes ?!
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Tlists are nil
  • From: alanglloyd@xxxxxxx
• Re: Tlists are nil
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Tlists are nil
  • From: mans
• Re: Tlists are nil
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Tlists are nil
  • From: kennedyri
• Tlists are nil
  • From: mans
• Re: Adding a component
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Adding a component
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Adding a component
  • From: G Baars
• Re: Justification for FOR loop
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Adding a component
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: Justification for FOR loop
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Justification for FOR loop
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Justification for FOR loop
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Justification for FOR loop
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Rudy Velthuis
• Re: Sending text to a cmd window
  • From: Maarten Wiltink
• Re: Delphi 2007 IDE Editor + Outlook Express 6 = BUGBUG.
  • From: Skybuck Flying

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(11)