Array keyword probably not necessary ?!
Hello,
The array keyword is probably not necessary and can be omitted:
var
a : [1..10] of integer;
// or
a : array[1..10] of [1..10] of [1..100] of [1..1000] of integer;
// or simply:
a : [1..10] of [1..10] of [1..100] of [1..1000] of integer;
At least for static arrays.
And for dynamic arrays it could look like:
a : [..] of integer;
Or simply:
a : [] of integer;
Kinda funny.
Bye,
Skybuck.
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Yet Another Newbie Question
... client-side script support is not a viable option as that feature can ... Arrays in ECMAScript implementations are of dynamic length by nature. ... var e_cart_descr; ... Even if the declarations above were omitted, that does not make sense as ... (comp.lang.javascript) - Re: Avoiding EVAL
... var rng = 'mun' ... So, of you want to abstract over your arrays, i.e., have a variable ... (comp.lang.javascript) - Re: javascript variables public or private?
... I am building arrays in JS and the arrays are inside a function. ... var pNodes = oLoadedXML.getElementsByTagName, ... pNode, cNode, cNodes, ... You could also add methods to the MenuData object to get and set internal properties to hold the data. ... (comp.lang.javascript) - Re: looping through array of associative arrays
... I'm trying to output the contents of an array of associative arrays in ... var games = new Array; ... "Associative arrays" in Javascript are actually just Objects ... var myObject = new Object; is technically the same as: ... (comp.lang.javascript) - Re: arrays by reference revisited?
... var B = A.concat; ... anything passed by reference (e.g. objects, arrays, functions) will have a referenced passed. ... if ('number' == typeof x) return x; ... (comp.lang.javascript) |
|