Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back
From: Brian Bushay TeamB (BBushay_at_Nmpls.com)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Previous message: Brian Bushay TeamB: "Re: Calling the ConnectionString Creator dialog"
- In reply to: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Next in thread: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Reply: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:13:08 -0500
>I start the transaction before the calling the post. I am just using a
>simple query here with data-aware controls and no batch updates at all.
>
>The transaction then rolls back, the changes to the database are lost, but
>the query has been posted and cannot be reposted. ie rolling back the
>transaction does not 'rollback' the pending updates in the query component.
>
>Hope I have explained it clearly.
You must be leaving a lot our because you message doesn't make sense.
All I can think of it that your query has locktype set to ltBatchUpdate so that
when it POSTs the data is only changed in memory.
If your Post caused ADO to write to the database and error would occur on the
POST command and it would fail leaving the user changes intact.
-- Brian Bushay (TeamB) Bbushay@NMPLS.com
- Next message: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Previous message: Brian Bushay TeamB: "Re: Calling the ConnectionString Creator dialog"
- In reply to: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Next in thread: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Reply: Matthew Pascoe: "Re: Updates lost after transaction rolls back"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|