Slightly OT : threads
From: Jeff Dyer (jeff.nospam_at_trustguard.co.uk)
Date: 12/23/04
- Next message: Bill Todd: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Previous message: Jeff Dyer: "Re: sql problem"
- Next in thread: Bill Todd: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: Bill Todd: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: danny heijl: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: Maurice Telkamp: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: J West: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: N.D. van Bochove: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: Rich S.: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:50:56 -0000
There's a recent post containing a problem which appears to be caused by the
use (misuse?) of threads.
Can anyone explain why the use of threads is *at all* appropriate for
databse work? After all, your average PC user does one thing at a time, so
why complicate matters for yourself by using threads, no matter how cool or
trendy it may be?
I'd like to use this technology if appropriate but I must admit I can't
think of a single thing that might actually *need* them.
Regards,
Jeff Dyer
(15 years of database and 7 years of Delphi programming under the belt,
without using 1 thread)
- Next message: Bill Todd: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Previous message: Jeff Dyer: "Re: sql problem"
- Next in thread: Bill Todd: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: Bill Todd: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: danny heijl: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: Maurice Telkamp: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: J West: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: N.D. van Bochove: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Reply: Rich S.: "Re: Slightly OT : threads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|