Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Brian Bushay TeamB <BBushay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:10:10 -0500
>I think I tried just about everything, and the only way I found
>is to eliminate any kind of linking between master and detail
>(only during inserts) by creating a totally independent memory
>table based on the detail data structure.
I do not believe your argument against posting the Master table is valid but if
you must do it that way it would be easier just to handle all the master/detial
linking in code. The master Afterscroll event can be used to sync detail to
master and the Detail OnNewRecord can be used to propagate the master linking
field to the detail.
--
Brian Bushay (TeamB)
Bbushay@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Michelle Brennan
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- References:
- In-Memory Dataset
- From: Michelle Brennan
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Vitali Kalinin
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Michelle Brennan
- In-Memory Dataset
- Prev by Date: Re: Read data from Access databas
- Next by Date: Re: In-Memory Dataset
- Previous by thread: Re: In-Memory Dataset
- Next by thread: Re: In-Memory Dataset
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|