Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: "Michelle Brennan" <mibi222@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Oct 2005 20:19:58 -0700
Hi Brian!
Which part about posting the master table are you referring to
that you don't agree with?
Is it when I said you have to post master BEFORE detail for the
link not to break?
If so, please explain once again. I tried everything I could
think of and the detail record ALWAYS disappears when posting
DETAIL datatset FIRST, whether I use IDENTITY or manually
setting the master and detail keys. I haven't tried GUIDs, but
I guess the master-detail linking works by the same principal
as manually setting keys.. it just guarantees uniqueness, from
what I understood.
About handling all master-detail in code, I'll try that. I hope
no other issues come up with that method!!
Thanks for your reply!
Brian Bushay TeamB <BBushay@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>I do not believe your argument against posting the Master table is valid but if
>you must do it that way it would be easier just to handle all the master/detial
>linking in code. The master Afterscroll event can be used to sync detail to
>master and the Detail OnNewRecord can be used to propagate the master linking
>field to the detail.
>
>--
>Brian Bushay (TeamB)
>Bbushay@xxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Brian Bushay TeamB
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- References:
- In-Memory Dataset
- From: Michelle Brennan
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Vitali Kalinin
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Michelle Brennan
- Re: In-Memory Dataset
- From: Brian Bushay TeamB
- In-Memory Dataset
- Prev by Date: Re: In-Memory Dataset
- Next by Date: Re: Delphi BPL ADO : You do not have an appropriate license to use this functionality.
- Previous by thread: Re: In-Memory Dataset
- Next by thread: Re: In-Memory Dataset
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|