Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!
From: Ignacio Vazquez (ivazquezATorioncommunications.com)
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Previous message: Ignacio Vazquez: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- In reply to: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Next in thread: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Reply: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:27:42 -0500
Betsy wrote:
> did that... (see first posting)...
It reads as though you sent it to the fax gateway. I'm saying to send
it to an e-mail account so that you can compare what the two methods
are doing differently.
-- Cheers, Ignacio
- Next message: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Previous message: Ignacio Vazquez: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- In reply to: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Next in thread: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Reply: Betsy: "Re: FAX ATTACHMENT - no cigar YET!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|