Re: Fastcode Blended Target
From: John O'Harrow (john_at_elmcrest.demon.co.uk)
Date: 12/26/03
- Previous message: John O'Harrow: "Re: Fastcode - my MinMax functions"
- In reply to: Dennis: "Re: Fastcode Blended Target"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:37:59 -0000
"Dennis" <marianndkc@home3.gvdnet.dk> wrote in message
news:3feb36cc@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Hi
>
> Do you recommend that I include all available benchmark results in the
> Blended and RTL replacement categories or should I standardize on the set
of
> processors discussed here?
>
> Do you find this set appropriate ?
>
> P3 1400 Celeron, P4 1600A, P4 3066, P4 2400 Celeron, XP 2500+ Barton and
> Opteron 240.
>
> Should a minimum set consist of these machines?
>
> Regards
> Dennis
I think that is a reasonable subset for benchmarking (I might leave out the
P4 1600), but validation should also include P2's for Blended and 80386 (or
a check for 386-only code) for RTL. I think we also need to weight the
scores so that low P3's and Celerons scores do not over influence the
results.
regards,
John.
- Previous message: John O'Harrow: "Re: Fastcode - my MinMax functions"
- In reply to: Dennis: "Re: Fastcode Blended Target"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
