Re: Fastcode AES B&V 1.1

From: Dennis (marianndkc_at_home3.gvdnet.dk)
Date: 12/22/04

  • Next message: John O'Harrow: "Re: Fastcode AES B&V 1.1" 
    Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:04:55 +0100

    Hi

    I still see a problem with the benchmark. Results can vary as much as 25%
    between runs. It looks like the problem is in the 4 encryption
    subbenchmarks.

    Regards
    Dennis

  • Next message: John O'Harrow: "Re: Fastcode AES B&V 1.1"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.8
      ... I think it is time to work on the benchmark and get it up to 1.0 standard. ... Do you want all subbenchmarks included in the benchmark? ... Regards ...
      (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
    • RE: GBDE write performance really sucks
      ... called "Simple BDE disc encryption benchmark". ... simple benchmark I got quite different results on much slower hardware. ... The benchmark was to copy the /usr directory (copied from the ATA disc, ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: encryption software for pendrive
      ... You should check for pendrives with U3 capabilities. ... Best regards ... Does anyone know of a free portable encryption solution? ... > drives and even on hard drives of some manufacturers. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Encryption > access denied after importing key with Certificate
      ... course weaken XP's encryption. ... > in regards to the problems i can run into when trying to ... > decrypt files which had being encrypted on a Pre SP1 ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Fastcode unofficial Debug IntToStr32 B&V 0.01
      ... > This benchmark has two subbenchmarks. ... > The number of subbenchmarks and subranges should be increased. ... I think the disadvantage of subranges - especially if there are many ... distribution that is used in real-world applications. ...
      (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)