Fastcode ComplexRectToPol B&V 1.2

From: Dennis (marianndkc_at_home3.gvdnet.dk)
Date: 12/26/04 

Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:06:59 +0100

Hi

Looked at validation for specific numbers where results are known. I see no
difference between formulaes used by me and John O'Harrow.

I changed the minimum value validated for extended in Validate2 from 1E-4096
to 1E-2000. All functions pass now. Our functions disagre at 1E-4096.

Please verify that I am doing the correct thing.

Best regards
Dennis

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fastcode ComplexRectToPol B&V 1.2
    ... > Looked at validation for specific numbers where results are known. ... > difference between formulaes used by me and John O'Harrow. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
  • Re: Default Value in table -- LEN: Len([ID]) vs, =Len("BILL_ID2")
    ... John - BTW what did 'PMFJI,' mean in your first email? ... rules combined appear to enforce the data validation intended. ... the length should only be 8 charachters. ... John Nurick [Microsoft Access MVP] ...
    (microsoft.public.access.tablesdbdesign)
  • Re: Can I use my XP Pro on a new PC?
    ... >> John to tell MS. ... >>> Currently, Genuine Windows Validation is optional, and you can opt ... > and installing the critical and security patches, etc., from Windows ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: SSL security authorization?
    ... Thanks John. ... >> SSL certificate validation. ... instead of raw HTTP password ... > submitting it to SF because I can't easily test it (setting up local ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Word 95 on XP?
    ... Last I heard, if you download the VALIDATION, and run it, ... I am BETTING you didn't BOTHER to actually CHECK the Ebay ... over yourself John. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)