Re: PosEx Status
From: John O'Harrow (john_at_elmcrest.demon.co.uk)
Date: 03/15/05
- Next message: John O'Harrow: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Previous message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: PosEx Status"
- In reply to: Aleksandr Sharahov: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Next in thread: Aleksandr Sharahov: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Reply: Aleksandr Sharahov: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:34:41 -0000
"Aleksandr Sharahov" <alsha-on-mail333.com> wrote in message
news:4236e7fe@newsgroups.borland.com...
>
> As John wrote "the only difference between the source code
> of the D7 version and the D2005 version is that the Offset
> parameter has changed from a Cardinal to an Integer".
CORRECTION
Sorry, I missed a few new lines of code added that specifically test for
Offset < 0 in the Win32 version, and then return 0. The only thing the
Win32 version does not check for is Offset = 0
regards,
John.
- Next message: John O'Harrow: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Previous message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: PosEx Status"
- In reply to: Aleksandr Sharahov: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Next in thread: Aleksandr Sharahov: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Reply: Aleksandr Sharahov: "Re: PosEx Status"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|