Re: Branch-less, loop-less "Move" implementations for MMs
- From: "Thorsten Engler [NexusDB]" <thorsten.englerNO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 18:17:10 +1000
> Anybody interested in starting a sub-challenge for a "Move" implementation
> dedicated to memory managers, that would have neither branches nor loops?
>[...]
> Work would thus essentially focus on identifying the most efficient
> instruction patterns for given transfer sizes/CPU combinations.
That's a very interesting topic, I've already done some experiments myself
in this direction, but generally usable code yet.
Cheers,
Thorsten
.
- References:
- Branch-less, loop-less "Move" implementations for MMs
- From: Eric Grange
- Branch-less, loop-less "Move" implementations for MMs
- Prev by Date: Counting cycles
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.34
- Previous by thread: Branch-less, loop-less "Move" implementations for MMs
- Next by thread: Counting cycles
- Index(es):