Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: "Pierre le Riche" <pleriche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:30:35 +0200
Hi,
>> None of the current entries do, but I am working on one that does.
>
> Interesting. Can you open some details?
I just don't need a dword marker between small blocks. I just need a byte to
allow me to store whether the block is allocated, etc. Assuming 8-byte
alignment of blocks, I can satisfy a request for 15 bytes out of a internal
chunk of 16 bytes. If I had a dword boundary marker I would have to use a
24-byte chunk to satisfy the same request. Since more than 90% of requests
in my appications are for less than 64 bytes, it makes a significant
difference.
Regards,
Pierre
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Robert Houdart
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- References:
- Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Primoz Gabrijelcic
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Pierre le Riche
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Fikret Hasovic
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Aleksandr Sharahov
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Aleksandr Sharahov
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Pierre le Riche
- Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- From: Aleksandr Sharahov
- Fastcode MM Rule
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode CompareMem B&V 1.0
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode CompareMem B&V 1.1
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode MM Rule
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|