Re: Fastcode UpperCase B&V 3.0

From: "Aleksandr Sharahov" <alsha-on-mail333.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:17:17 +0400

Hi Dennis,

> For this to be possible we must decide upon the validity of the new
> functions by Aleksandr.

Yes, they are valid.

> Do they allocate to much memory for the result
> string? If yes - can we accept that?

Right question is:
Do they significantly decrease available memory?

Right answer is:
They do not decrease available memory under any
existing MM.

--
regards
Aleksandr

.

References:
- Fastcode UpperCase B&V 3.0
  - From: Dennis

Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode UpperCase B&V 2.8
Next by Date: filling big array of double
Previous by thread: Fastcode UpperCase B&V 3.0
Next by thread: Re: Fastcode UpperCase B&V 3.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Fastcode UpperCase B&V 3.0
... The only difference is V6 functions did not reallocate ... memory when new result takes equal number of DWORDs ... Aleksandr ... Prev by Date: ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
Re: Fastcode Rules
... > not use this memory. ... Aleksandr ... Prev by Date: ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)