Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41
- From: "Avatar Zondertau" <avatarzt@xxxxxxxxx (please reply to newsgroup)>
- Date: 31 May 2005 08:42:11 -0700
> Draft for todo list:
>
> -The new benchmark by Avatar
> -New benchmarks by Pierre
> -FastMM4
> -Dll validation by Eric Grange
> -Fragmentation validation by Dennis
While testing my QuickSort based benchmarks i noticed some more things
about the B&V:
- FastMM4 and nxReplacementMemoryManager units seem to be missing.
- HEAP_NO_SERIALIZE doesn't seem to be defined (Delphi 7). Definition:
const HEAP_NO_SERIALIZE = $00000001;
The benchmarks are now done; i also created one that does integers.
I'll post both as replies to this message.
Note that sorting may be somewhat too fast with QuickSort; the number
of runs may need adjustment. The TList implemenetations are more than
37 (extended) and more than 7 (integer) times faster that the other
sorting method.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41 (extended)
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41 (integer benchmark)
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41
- References:
- Fastcode MM B&V 0.41
- From: Dennis
- Fastcode MM B&V 0.41
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41 (integer benchmark)
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.41 (integer benchmark)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
