Re: New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- From: "John O'Harrow" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:38:41 +0100
"Avatar Zondertau" <avatarzt@xxxxxxxxx (please reply to newsgroup)> wrote in
message news:42a9c80b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Some things that i hope you can assist me with:
>
> - Is validation for IntToStr64 correct (especially 3)?
I don't think validating the whole int64 range will ever be possible. Given
that it takes approx 7 minutes to validate the 32-bit integer range with my
fastest function, it would take over 57,000 years to validate the entire
int64 range.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- Re: New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- References:
- New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode MM with C++ Builder 6
- Next by Date: Re: New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- Previous by thread: Re: New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- Next by thread: Re: New release of IntToStr and Sort Benchmark and validation tools
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|