Re: Fastcode SSE3 Support Implementation
- From: "Pieter Zijlstra" <p.zylstra.notthis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:26:29 +0200
Dennis wrote:
> This is the reason I am so much against IFDEF's, even around single
> lines. I see little benefit from using the IFDEF version and surely
> not enough to justify the huge increase in potential problems.
I've never written SSE3 before how is that generally done? Just compile
it in D2005 and then copy the DB's or do you know them by heart (*)?
>From a validation/benchmarking point of view the second implementation
would be better IMO.
The only danger I see in the second implementation is that the
documentation and code become out of synch, assuming that the coder
knows the DB's by heart (needs more self-control from the coder to
update them both).
(*) Not sure if this is proper English, but what I meant was: Do you
remember them, without searching books/internet.
--
Pieter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode SSE3 Support Implementation
- From: Eric Grange
- Re: Fastcode SSE3 Support Implementation
- References:
- Fastcode SSE3 Support Implementation
- From: Dennis
- Fastcode SSE3 Support Implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode - Sponsoring
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode - Sponsoring
- Previous by thread: Fastcode SSE3 Support Implementation
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode SSE3 Support Implementation
- Index(es):