Re: improvement of index-calculation

From: "Guenther Wimpassinger" <gw_spam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:18:34 +0200

"Guenther Wimpassinger" <gw_spam@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb

> bt EAX,EBX
> lahf
> xchg AL,AH

replace the above with
mov ECX,EBX
shr EAX,CL

> and EAX,$1

is easier to read and faster

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: improvement of index-calculation
  - From: Les Pawelczyk

References:
- improvement of index-calculation
  - From: Guenther Wimpassinger
- Re: improvement of index-calculation
  - From: Guenther Wimpassinger

Prev by Date: Re: improvement of index-calculation
Next by Date: Fragmenting memory
Previous by thread: Re: improvement of index-calculation
Next by thread: Re: improvement of index-calculation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
... mov edx,eax ... shr eax,1 ... sub edx,eax ... Prev by Date: ...
(comp.lang.asm.x86)
Re: Fastcode : function wont work with length>65535 ?
... push ebx ... mov edi,edx ... xor ebx,ebx ... shr ecx,2 ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
Re: Fastcode : function wont work with length>65535 ?
... push ebx ... mov edi,edx ... xor ebx,ebx ... shr ecx,2 ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
Re: Fastcode : function wont work with length>65535 ?
... push ebx ... mov edi,edx ... xor ebx,ebx ... shr ecx,2 ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
Re: Is Dec function thread safe?
... >>This should only be used to lock the bus prior to XCHG, MOV, IN and ...
(comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc)