Re: NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- From: "Kristofer Skaug" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:54:28 +0200
Lord Crc wrote:
> I haven't really looked at register usage, you might be able to
> optimize it somewhat/a lot. I went for in-the-moment ease of coding :)
Works 100% (I have a fairly serious validation test) and is more than twice
as fast (on average) as the naive pascal-based code on my humble P4/1700.
Zillions of thanks! If you ever need help with satellite packet telemetry
decoding, I owe you one <g>.
--
Kristofer
.
- References:
- NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- From: Kristofer Skaug
- Re: NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- From: Lord Crc
- Re: NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- From: Kristofer Skaug
- Re: NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- From: Lord Crc
- Re: NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- From: Kristofer Skaug
- Re: NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- From: Lord Crc
- NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- Prev by Date: Re: improvement of index-calculation
- Next by Date: Re: YANFCQ [Yet Another Non-FastCode Question]: TDateTime -> uSec resolution
- Previous by thread: Re: NAFCQY [Not A FastCode Question, Yay!]: Int64 DivMod
- Next by thread: YANFCQ [Yet Another Non-FastCode Question]: TDateTime -> uSec resolution
- Index(es):