Re: Fastcode CPUID Unit
- From: Thaddy <kol@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:38:31 +0200
Dennis wrote:
While you're (somebody is) at it:X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Hi
Who volunteers to update the CPUID unit to handle
Athlon 64 X2 4600+
Processor Type: 0 Family: 15 Model: 11 Stepping: 1 Name: Not Detected (but really is Athlon 64 X2 4600+) Frequency: 2412MHz Vendor: Authentic AMD
and
Dothan 760 2GHz laptop says Not detected too:
Processor Type: 0 Family: 6 Model: 13 Stepping: 8 Name: Not detected Frequency: 798 MHz Vendor: GenuineIntel
-- Best regards Dennis
Remove the dependency on sysutils, please!
Using standard exception handling in such code is a VERY BAD (shouting intended) idea! and not necessary. I remember previous versions didn't rely on it.
*Compliment:*
I use fastcode code all the time and you people are doing a wonderfull job!
Regards,
Thaddy .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode CPUID Unit
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CPUID Unit
- References:
- Fastcode CPUID Unit
- From: Dennis
- Fastcode CPUID Unit
- Prev by Date: Fastcode CPUID Unit
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode CPUID Unit
- Previous by thread: Fastcode CPUID Unit
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode CPUID Unit
- Index(es):