Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: "Bruce McGee" <bmcgee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Aug 2005 09:33:12 -0700
Dennis wrote:
> Hi Bruce
>
> We do not support D5. Doing nothing is OK, but it is very cheap to
> db the instruction as suggested by Lars.
>
> Best regards
> Dennis
I know D5 isn't officially supported by FastCode. I just like the idea
of erring on the side of compatibility if it doesn't cost much. This
way at least the B&V isn't the limiting factor.
Unfortunately, it looks like there are other instructions (CPUID,
ANDPS) and incompatibilities with Delphi 5 that might not be worth
retro-fitting.
--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Anders Isaksson
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Roby Della Pasqua
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- References:
- rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Dennis
- rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Prev by Date: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Next by Date: QC Report on Swap Function
- Previous by thread: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Next by thread: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|