Re: QC Report on Swap Function
- From: "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <velthuis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:31:19 +0200
At 19:28:34, 28.08.2005, Lars wrote:
> True but why no have a swap there is working on 4 byte variables ?
Swap is a compatibility routine only. Why do more work on it than
necessary? I agree that a SwapD would not be hard to implement, but I
guess it is implemented various times already.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://velthuis.homepage.t-online.de
"Plato was a bore."
- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
.
- References:
- QC Report on Swap Function
- From: Dennis
- Re: QC Report on Swap Function
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: QC Report on Swap Function
- From: Lars
- QC Report on Swap Function
- Prev by Date: Re: QC Report on Swap Function
- Next by Date: Re: Does Fast Code units compile in D5 Standard ?
- Previous by thread: Re: QC Report on Swap Function
- Next by thread: Re: QC Report on Swap Function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|