Re: QC Report on Swap Function

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote: 
At 18:51:52, 28.08.2005, Dennis wrote:


Hi

Do you find it OK that this report is closed with status "As designed"?

swap is defective on 4 byte variables
http://qc.borland.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=13719



I don't see it as defective.


True but why no have a swap there is working on 4 byte variables ?

For the next version of delphi we can make some new functions for borland.

I can see the swap there is now is a compiler magic function as in 'inline'
before the compiler had inline option. ;-)

Is there a reason for not put in new overloaded functions ?

Regards
Lars G
.