Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: "Roby Della Pasqua" <roberto AT dellapasqua.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:12:13 +0200
why not use QueryPerformanceCounter QueryPerformanceFrequency?
"Bruce McGee" <bmcgee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xn0e6j67d80kdfb003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dennis wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruce
>>
>> We do not support D5. Doing nothing is OK, but it is very cheap to
>> db the instruction as suggested by Lars.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Dennis
>
> I know D5 isn't officially supported by FastCode. I just like the idea
> of erring on the side of compatibility if it doesn't cost much. This
> way at least the B&V isn't the limiting factor.
>
> Unfortunately, it looks like there are other instructions (CPUID,
> ANDPS) and incompatibilities with Delphi 5 that might not be worth
> retro-fitting.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Bruce McGee
> Glooscap Software
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Dennis
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- References:
- rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Dennis
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- From: Bruce McGee
- rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with FastMM and D7
- Next by Date: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Previous by thread: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Next by thread: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|