Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()

From: "Dennis" <marianndkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:13:10 +0200

Hi

I use QueryPerformanceCounter & QueryPerformanceFrequency in all the B&V's.

IMHO. There is no need to change something that works in the MM B&V.

Best regards
Dennis

Donate to the Fastcode Project:
http://dennishomepage.gugs-cats.dk/FastCodeProject.htm

.

References:
- rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
  - From: Bruce McGee
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
  - From: Dennis
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
  - From: Bruce McGee
- Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
  - From: Roby Della Pasqua

Prev by Date: Potential FastCode speed increase?
Next by Date: Assembler Directive
Previous by thread: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
Next by thread: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: PC timer
... QueryPerformanceCounter() and QueryPerformanceFrequency. ... Regards, ... -Le Chaud Lapin- ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.electronics.design)
Re: QC Report on Swap Function
... I am sure that BASM functions can be inlined - technically. ... Best regards ... Dennis ... Donate to the Fastcode Project: ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)