Re: QC Report on Swap Function

From: "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <velthuis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:09:57 +0200

At 21:57:11, 29.08.2005, Kristofer Skaug wrote:

> Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
> > >
> > > One requesting the outdated Swap to be removed.
> >
> > Why? It is compatibility code. Some code might still use it.
>
> I agree, but they should deprecate it and direct new code to a Swap16
> function.

Not sure how easy it is to deprecate a magic function. Ok, some SwapXX
functions might be in order, but that can't be too hard, can it?
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://velthuis.homepage.t-online.de

"We are not retreating - we are advancing in another Direction."
-- General Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964)
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: QC Report on Swap Function
  - From: Will DeWitt Jr.

References:
- QC Report on Swap Function
  - From: Dennis
- Re: QC Report on Swap Function
  - From: Dennis
- Re: QC Report on Swap Function
  - From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: QC Report on Swap Function
  - From: Kristofer Skaug

Prev by Date: Re: QC Report on Swap Function
Next by Date: Re: rdtsc vs. GetTickCount()
Previous by thread: Re: QC Report on Swap Function
Next by thread: Re: QC Report on Swap Function
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: QC Report on Swap Function
... >> One requesting the outdated Swap to be removed. ... It is compatibility code. ... Prev by Date: ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
Re: QC Report on Swap Function
... > I suggest that we create two new QC reports. ... > One requesting the outdated Swap to be removed. ... It is compatibility code. ...
(borland.public.delphi.language.basm)