Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: "Bruce McGee" <bmcgee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2005 06:29:37 -0700
Avatar Zondertau wrote:
[...]
> Yes, this does make sense. It may be useful to allow the B&V to run
> without GUI, getting it's input from the command line and reporting to
> the standard output. In this case we should probably agree on the
> command line syntax, so Dennis' and my (and others in the future?)
> B&V's will have compatible commandline interfaces.
Or with a minimal UI.
The MM B&V allows for -V and -B command line switches for validations
and benchmarks, respectively. This is kind of a unique case where it
makes sense to run them separately. Maybe just something like -B to
run, report and close.
> Yes, i like this too. And what about a B&V that can also post results
> by itself, either to the newsgroup or to a WebService that registers
> the results automatically for Dennis?
I'm not sure about this. I keep thinking of cases where the test
machine isn't connected to the Internet or where someone is working on
their own submission or they've accidentally messed up the run
(another big app is running) and can't have or don't want every
benchmark to be reported back. This way, the user makes a conscious
decision to post results. Maybe another command line switch?
--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software
.
- References:
- FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: Dennis
- Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- Prev by Date: Re: QC Report on Swap Function
- Next by Date: Fastcode CompareStr B&V 0.2
- Previous by thread: Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- Next by thread: Re: FastCode - IntToStr B&V v0.12
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|