Re: FastMM options for B&V

From: "Bruce McGee" <bmcgee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 28 Oct 2005 03:16:46 -0700

How about compiler options? I always build with range and overflow
checking turned on. I think they're worth any performance hit in my
production code for the safety they add.

Is this an unnecessary overhead for performance testing? Should B&Vs
use the default settings?

Apologies if this has already been discussed.

--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software
.

References:
- FastMM options for B&V
  - From: Bruce McGee
- Re: FastMM options for B&V
  - From: Dennis

Prev by Date: Re: FastMM: Compiler defines, and controlling FastMM4Options.inc
Next by Date: Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.53
Previous by thread: Re: FastMM options for B&V
Next by thread: Re: FastMM options for B&V
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Do you tick "Enable file and folder compression" when formatting a data volume?
... Disk is cheap, and recovery is expensive. ... ;) And even though the performance hit isn't huge, the increased risk isn't worth it. ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
Re: building a query using other queries
... I know there's always a performance hit with linked tables, ... it's well worth it, because we won't use it that often. ... bloating problems - so the performance hit will be worth it to eliminate ... Paul ...
(microsoft.public.access.queries)
Re: Passing Variable Length Argument List to Parent
... I'm typing this without testing it, but it seems like it would work. ... sure you take a performance hit from the evalcall, ... Worth a shot. ...
(comp.lang.php)