Re: REP RET
- From: "Avatar Zondertau" <avatarzt@xxxxxxxxx (please reply to newsgroup)>
- Date: 31 Oct 2005 09:57:11 -0700
> > Thanks a lot for the info. I guess if Microsoft uses it, then it
> > must be safe. Even if it wasn't safe before, now it will be - I
> > don't think Intel will dare break compatibility with Microsoft
> > software.
>
> Yeah, I have my doubts that REP RET will ever be used by Intel for
> anything now (except, perhaps, for the same thing AMD uses it for). It
> makes me wonder if VS 2003 didn't have this as well-- okay, checked,
> and VS 2003 didn't have REP RET in secchk.c. So this is definitely
> something new in VS 2005 (unless REP RET was used elsewhere in VS
> 2003).
>
> > I really battled to get anything out of either AMD or Intel. Intel
> > wanted me to sign an NDA, and the folks from AMD developer support
> > were clueless. :-(
>
> Yeah, the whole NDA thing was just silly, though AMD not knowing about
> it at all (since it was in their docs) was really weird.
>
> But obviously someone at Microsoft managed to get it sorted out. =)
Actually i think they did sign the NDA. In that case perhaps Intel did
indeed give them information about the future effect of REP RET.
However i still don't see why Intel would do such a thing, as this only
means advantage for their competitor.
.
- References:
- REP RET
- From: Will DeWitt Jr.
- Re: REP RET
- From: Pierre le Riche
- Re: REP RET
- From: Will DeWitt Jr.
- REP RET
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode Move Library
- Previous by thread: Re: REP RET
- Next by thread: FastMM suggestion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|