Re: FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- From: "Dennis" <marianndkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:57:02 +0100
Hi Bruce
Very nice to see some action. I think we still have time to reach 1.0
quality before 12/12. My opinion is that the validation needs a little
improvement and that's it.
ToDo:
- Replace quality label validations with supported/not supported.
- Update validation and benchmark descriptions to be more descriptive -
need this information from the original authors.
- Add author names to benchmark descriptions (where available).
- Include the latest FastMM - currently 4.48.
- include the latest DCK_IA32 MM - currently 0.24.
- Add new benchmark from Dennis - SingleFPBenchmark2
-Megamultithreaded validation with interthread communication
-Integration of Dll test
-Latest Nexus MM (maybe we have the latest)
-DeXter support
-3GB validation ?
Benchmark descriptions are quite OK.
Validation descriptions are in the Source.
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- From: Bruce McGee
- Re: FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- From: Pierre le Riche
- Re: FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- References:
- FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- From: Bruce McGee
- FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- Prev by Date: Re: RoundEx without Banker's rounding
- Next by Date: Re: Dexter produce the fastest runtime performances!
- Previous by thread: FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- Next by thread: Re: FastCode MM B&V 0.56
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
