Re: Benchmarker
- From: "Avatar Zondertau" <avatarzt@xxxxxxxxx (please reply to newsgroup)>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:52:49 +0100
> > > Like we will need more speed on most curious processors (Cyrix,
> > > Via, Transmeta etc...), but most commonly old Pentiums
> >
> > This would be possible to build into my B&V toll, since it includes
> > system information anyways.
>
> What I was thinking of is to have each contesting routine to
> register itself with the following information:
>
> Catogry {what is it --Pos(), IntToStr() etc}
> CPUKind
> RoutineID
>
> so that, the platform the B&V runs decides which routine
> to include.
>
> I did also include information about the author (name, email,
> web) as well as license information for the routine.
It is not desirable that the B&V tool include multiple challenges. The
challenges (possibly consisting of multiple subchallenges) should be in
one executable.
That said my B&V does support adding (sub)challenges by simply adding a
unit. A challenge is a class which extends a class defined in the B&V.
It can be registered by one line in the initialization section.
Each of the functions have a name, a specification of the CPU type and
their author registered with them. Functions can also be added by
adding a line in the initialization section which registers them with
the appropriate (sub)challenge.
--
The Fastcode Project: http://www.fastcodeproject.org/
.
- References:
- Benchmarker
- From: Adem
- Re: Benchmarker
- From: Tommi Prami
- Re: Benchmarker
- From: Avatar Zondertau
- Re: Benchmarker
- From: Adem
- Benchmarker
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode Memory Manager B&V 1.0.0
- Next by Date: Re: Searching Atribute-Value lists
- Previous by thread: Re: Benchmarker
- Next by thread: Searching Atribute-Value lists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading