Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- From: "Davy Landman" <davy.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:17:17 +0100
Hi Dennis,
I do not think that the random function matters much in this situation and
think that the buildin is ok. Opinions wanted.
I thought the problem with the random is that, it's random and Delphi's
random has gotten better, but is not always equaly distributed..
We could use MT for 2 options:
1. Better distribution
2. We could use a fixed state as input so each time the same random string's
are generated? (this would mean more stable results I would guess)
When using option 2, there would be the need for big test cases or else some
states might be a little bit baised..
Do we really want so long strings?
I was just guessing, maybe looking at the Pos BV?
Best regards,
Davy Landman
.
- References:
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- From: Davy Landman
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- From: Dennis
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.4.0
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.5.0
- Index(es):