Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- From: "Davy Landman" <davy.landman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:26:16 +0100
Hi John,
Nice idea, but would it be an good idea to read then bytes for the start of
the string?
-4 = size
-8 = refcount...
but -12/10 ?
Looking at the code I can see it will probably be faster..
my code generates to an [esi+eax+$01-$04], while your code will lead to an
[esi + $00-$00].. nice idea :)
allthough too bad the R+ is needed..
Regards,
Davy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- From: John O'Harrow
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- From: Davy Landman
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- References:
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- From: Davy Landman
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- From: John O'Harrow
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- Prev by Date: FastMM4 - Help with shared memory ?
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode SpreadsheetCreator 0.9.8
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.0
- Index(es):