Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: "Dennis" <marianndkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:42:47 +0100
Hi
And allow the use of a 16 byte register for the length and the loopcounter?
I think 16 bit would be enough ;-)
Longer strings will set more bits of the length field. We could validate
against longer strings without validation agains all of them. I will make a
validation function with exponential length increase instead of linear.
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 6011 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.
.
- References:
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: John O'Harrow
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: John O'Harrow
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode SpreadsheetCreator 0.9.8
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.7.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- Index(es):